Identify Public Information And Biases

Take Control of Education In America

And Work To Utterly Destroy It

In 1954, a Congressional Committee discovered a plot to re-write the nation’s textbooks (see senator Dodd’s committee reports). When the recognized historians of the time were approached to perform the re-write the plotters were turned down flat. So they created their own historical group by issuing twenty prestigious scholarships and sent the group to London to study and get indoctrinated. This group became known as the American Historical Association, and they re-wrote the textbooks. .

The educational changes were applied gradually in order to not alarm the general public.

 

The plotters were the One World Government agents, and were (and still are) executing the Illuminati agenda, including the following two objectives:

1) Utterly destroy all national identity and national pride.

2) Take control of education in America and work to utterly destroy it.

 

The following article by Linda Denny describes how these goals are cleverly disguised in today’s educational system (and news media too).

 

Inference or observation: that is the question. I was blessed to work in the public school system, teaching science for over 20 years. I became increasingly convinced how important it was for my students (and all people, I believe) to be able to distinguish between observed information and inferred information. Inundating books and media is information presented as factual which isn’t observable information. Inferred statements are presented as facts. They may be true facts with wrong conclusions.

Observations are conclusions based on direct sensory data received through our 5 senses. Inferences are conclusions derived from present or previous observations. They may be true or incorrect. Example: I may observe my friend frowning at me. I may infer they are angry with me. The reality may be they have a toothache. This is a simple example. However, so much information is given in textbooks and movies that is stated as clear facts, but is not directly observable by the person making the statement (or sometimes by any human being). It is inferred: it may be true or false. When a false inference is used to make more conclusions, the initial foundation is not solid and subsequent conclusions may be unreliable.

It became increasingly clear to me in the Science resources we were using, how prevalent inferred statements were given as fact. Example: One of our resources was National Geographic movies depicting gorgeous creative beauty or wonders of the uniquely designed species were photographed to share and then some statement is made about “billions of years ago when—“. Who was walking on the face of the earth billions of years ago? It is an inferred conclusion, not a fact observed by the maker of the statement.

It is an important skill to make solidly-based inferences. I think an even more important skill is to be able to distinguish observed information from that which is only inferred. Students need to be able to correctly evaluate the massive amounts of information fed to them: all people do. Those instructing students need to facilitate the development of these important skills, as opposed to swallowing whole all that is fed to them.

Linda Merriam Denny; Editor, Education Corner, ARHP foundation

Author’s note: The individual parent cannot change school textbooks, but they can help persuade the teacher to develop critical information-sorting skills in their students.

 

The original textbooks extolled American national policies when those policies tended to elevate the average citizen of the world. That engendered a national pride. The textbooks now suggest, or openly state that we undertook those actions so we could exploit the average citizen of the world. So that develops a spirit of government distrust and dislike in the American citizen.

The state of Texas now has re-written its history books with the correct historical view. Why not approach your local school board with the suggestion that they use the Texas schoolbooks? Then watch the fur fly!

 

Own And/Or Control The News Media

This section describes today’s news coverage from the perspective of their owners, the One World Government group and their agenda.

In Today’s world it is increasingly difficult to assess information in the public sector. This is primarily because the information provided is delivered to the public through a small number of corporate or government owned entities.

Global Warming

Prologue
Imagine if the United Nations gets its way and a CO2 emissions tax is imposed on the world. You should be reminded that when the US congress first created the income tax, they promised that only the top 2% of income-earners would ever be taxed. What a lot of hot air that was. It wound up that virtually every wage earner is being taxed.
Then remember too that your breath creates CO2 emissions. Do you really think that an oppressive One World Government would not use that knowledge as a means of enforcing its subjection of the human race?
When you control all the important newspapers, TV broadcasting stations and most radio stations, you can get away with outright lies. Furthermore, when you have enough money to buy ‘scientific proof’; you can easily twist the truth.

Discussion
A Washington Post headline announces “It’s official, 2014 was the hottest year in recorded history”. To a casual observer of headlines, this might appear rather convincing, perhaps even ominous. Let’s look a bit deeper. Does recorded history refer to 5000 years or to 135 years (from 1885), when temperature data was being gathered? How much hotter has 2014 been? According to NASA, this rise in temperature is .02 degrees C higher, with a margin of error .1 degrees C. This margin of error is 5 times greater than the temperature increase. Actually, since 1988, global temperatures have remained about the same; they hit a plateau about 17 years ago. This is despite the surge in greenhouse gas emissions in places like China and India. The Berkeley Earth Temperature Project admitted that Earth’s temperatures changed very little the past decade.
Another helpful aspect to look into is how the data is gathered; is it a reliable method for true conclusions. Weather stations are now placed in more urban areas than when they were originally placed, due to the spreading out of urban centers. This makes for something called the Urban heat island affect. There is, as might be expected, higher temperatures in urban areas. So temperatures are adjusted. This can be done more with a guessing method. Accuracy of the results is questionable. A far more accurate and available way to gather the temperature data is by using satellites. Harder to reach areas can be more easily accessed with satellites. Satellites overall don’t show global warming. John Christy, from the Earth Science Center of the University of Alabama, claims temperature changes since 2001 are statistically insignificant.
Another interesting find is regarding Antarctica’s ice level. Its ice shows the highest amount levels in 2014. Almost 90% of the world’s ice mass is in Antarctica.
Global warming proponents rely heavily on computer models to support their assertions. Computers only respond to the data programmed into them. They are limited by the accuracy of the data, the completeness of the data and the manner in which they are programmed to analyze the given data.
It is important to be sure that one is discerning insofar as the basis for sweeping assertions like global warming.
Noel Brown of the United Nations Environmental Program previously claimed that entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth if global warming isn’t stopped by 2000, by rising sea levels. What a lot of baloney that was!
President Obama, in his second inaugural address, claimed that climate change is the greatest threat the world faces. More baloney!
Proponents of global warming warn of forest fires, crippling droughts and major storms. In reality, forest fire incidents have gone down, crippling droughts have remained about the same the last 60 years and hurricanes and tornadoes have been going down in frequency and intensity. I think it is important to recognize two very potentially destructive weapons operating through big agencies and voices, and to respond with true discernment. Fear and control are these big weapons. Deception can be closely intertwined. A big international agency, The United Nations, has an agency called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). They have scheduled a conference in Paris for Nov. 30-Dec. 11. Another big voice in our present world is Pope Frances. He says global warming is real and although he isn’t sure it is all due to man-made causes, supports this as a major reason. His Papal Encyclical, a 50-60 page document, if issued, is to state that the fight against global warming is a moral imperative. Think of all the people that have been and/or are currently influenced by the papacy.
If two big voices in our world are coming together to fight what they deem a major threat, what ways may people be impacted throughout this world? Could mobility be affected with limited access to transportation and fuel? Would it affect the food sources and types of food available? Would family freedoms like number of children be impacted?
I believe an even bigger question is this: is global warming even a viable threat to mankind? Does the true evidence even merit serious consideration of it as a danger? Does it actually mask must more important, timely needs of our world which really do need to be recognized and addressed?
For those readers who like myself, believe the Bible is True, trustworthy and given by God, I encourage you to read such Scriptures as Genesis 8:21,22; Genesis 9:8-13; Jeremiah 33:25,26; and 2 Timothy 3:13. I also was very encouraged by Hal Lindsay”s report of February 27, 2015.
Linda Merriam Denny, editor

Global Warming Summary
Linda’s article proves beyond a doubt that there is no such thing as global warming or significant melting of the Antarctica ice cap. The next time you hear those words from the One-World-Govt.-Owned news media, remember this article.

 

 

Utterly Destroy All National Identity And National Pride

 

 

Encourage, And Eventually Legalize The Use of Drugs

 

 

 

Demoralize Workers By Creating Mass Unemployment

 

 

Create One Crisis After Another And Through Control of The Mass Media, Appear To ‘Manage’ Each Crisis

 

 

 

Organize And Support A World-Wide Terrorist Apparatus

 

 

 

Support Political Chaos

 

 

 

Take Control of All Domestic And Foreign Policies In The USA

 

 

 

The Second Amendment

The Second Amendment; Discussion

It is not enough for the One-World Government to govern all societies, they must rule them. A nation whose citizens are armed cannot be ruled, they can only be governed. That is why we continually see attacks on the 2nd amendment. All guns have already been confiscated in England, Australia, Canada and most of Europe. Only the USA stands in the way. The reader should be reminded that in the event of a national emergency, the constitution can be suspended. Be continually alert to this eventuality.